The New York Times published an editorial on December 24, 2011, addressing the lack of competent legal representation for individuals facing deportation. The editorial was written based on a study in the Cardozo Law Review that focused on cases in New York state, surveying judges from five immigration courts.
The report revealed that in 14 percent of cases in New York state, "attorneys' preparation and knowledge of the law and the facts were 'grossly inadequate.'" and that growing majority of people had no representation at all. Between October 2005 and July 2010, there were nearly 15,000 cases (27 percent of the total) where immigrants had to appear in court without representation. Indigent immigrants who appear in immigration court are not entitled to court-appointed counsel - a difference between criminal court and immigration court.
Meanwhile, Congress has cut funding for the federal Legal Services Corporation, which impacts not only immigrants seeking legal representation in immigration court, but also a large number of Americans who need legal aid in civil matters such as home foreclosures, evictions, and child support cases.
The New York Times editorial suggested some improvements to the current system. For more information, click here.
Glickman Turley's experienced attorneys represent individuals on a wide range of immigration matters, as well as other legal issues. Please contact our attorneys if you wish to discuss representation on immigration matters, real estate purchase and sales, condominium associations, criminal defense, non-profit law, civil litigation, business litigation, business law, probate matters including wills, powers of attorney, health care proxy, same-sex parent adoptions, guardianships, animal law, or LGBT legal matters.
